The Difference Between a Liberal and a Conservative

September 20th, 2010 by Whitey Leave a reply »
Of all the political theories used to understand our complex political system, one of the most useful is “Social Dominance Theory” (SDT) developed by Sidanius and Pratto. This is a sociological theory that seek to make sense of social hierarchies and how they are formed and maintained. To understand social hierarchies is to understand discrimination, oppression,  stereotypes, inequality, racism, sexism, ageism, homophobia, nationalism, and the like. In short, SDT provides a framework for understanding power and group inequality.
Sidanius and Pratto’s 1999 book, Social Dominance, exhibits high scholarly standards, and is considered a classic sociological text. For anyone who wants to understand human systems, including political-economic social systems, this is an excellent read. There work is particularly relevant for understanding the difference between conservatives and liberals. Essentially, a political conservative is someone who accepts group inequality—that is, when a small group of elites dominates the majority (the subordinate group). A liberal is someone who seeks more egalitarian social organization, with equal opportunity for all groups. SDT identifies the attitudes associated with conservative/liberal views by measuring a group’s “social dominance orientation.”
“Social dominance orientation” is the degree to which individuals desire and support group-based hierarchy and domination of “inferior” groups by “superior” groups. Individuals have varying degrees of social dominance orientation. Political conservatism, authoritarianism, racism, sexism, lack of empathy, acceptance inequality, patriotism, and the presence of oppressive and discriminatory behavior is strongly correlated with social dominance orientation. The following questions measure social dominance orientation (each item rated on a 1-7 scale, with items 9-16 reverse rated):
  1. Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups.
  2. In getting what you want, it is sometimes necessary to use force against other groups.
  3. It’s OK if some groups have more of a chance in life than others.
  4. To get ahead in life, it is sometimes necessary to step on other groups.
  5. If certain groups stayed in their place, we would have fewer problems.
  6. It’s probably a good thing that certain groups are at the top and other groups are at the bottom.
  7. Inferior groups should stay in their place.
  8. Sometimes other groups must be kept in their place.
  9. It would be good if groups could be equal.
  10. Group equality should be our ideal.
  11. All groups should be given an equal chance in life.
  12. We should do what we can to equalize conditions for different groups.
  13. Increased social equality.
  14. We would have fewer problems if we treated people more equally.
  15. We should strive to make incomes as equal as possible.
  16. No group should dominate in society.

Social dominance orientation (SDO) is positively associated with the tendency to assign internal attribution (e.g, laziness, less intellectual abilities) for the misfortunes of low-status others, and negatively associated with external attributes (e.g., poor schools, effects of past discrimination) of the same (page 88). This is very similar to Ken Wilber’s distinction between conservatives and liberals:

…when it comes to the cause of human suffering, liberals tend to believe in objective causation, whereas conservatives tend to believe in subjective causation. That is, if an individual is suffering, the typical liberal tends to blame objective social institutions (if you are poor it is because you are oppressed by society), whereas the typical conservative tends to blame subjective factors (if you are poor it is because you are lazy). Thus, the liberal recommends objective social interventions: redistribute the wealth, change social institutions so that they produce fairer outcomes, evenly slice the economic pie, aim for equality among all. The typical conservative recommends that we instill family values, demand that individuals assume more responsibility for themselves, tighten up slack moral standards (often by embracing traditional religious values), encourage a work ethic, reward achievement, and so on.

The traditional conservative ideology is rooted in a conventional, mythic-membership…with roots as well in aristocratic and hierarchical social values and a tendency toward patriarchy and militarism. This type of mythic membership and civic virtue dominated cultural consciousness from approximately 1,000 BCE to the Enlightenment in the West, whereupon a fundamentally new average mode of consciousness…emerged on an influential scale, bringing with it a new mode of political ideology, namely, liberalism…

That is the great irony of liberalism. Theorists have long agreed that traditional liberalism is inherently self-contradictory, because it champions equality and freedom, and you can have one or the other of those, not both…Liberalism thus refused to make any “judgments” about the interiors of individuals—no stance is better than another!—and instead focused merely on finding ways to fix the exterior, economic, social institutions, and thus it completely abandoned the interiors (values, meanings, interior development) to the conservatives. The conservatives, on the other hand, fully embraced interior development (source).

This is obviously a simplification of the two perspectives, and it leave out some important nuances. Still, it is a useful distinction. Ask yourself why poor people suffer and you will know if you are a conservative (“it is their own fault”) or a liberal (“our society has put them in this situation”). Conservatives may emphasize internal traits and beliefs, but the focus is on one group (their own) having superior abilities and other groups as having inferior abilities. Sidanius and Pratto point out that, “Political conservatism has been consistently found to be related to racism, ethnocentrism, and generalized xenophobia. This pattern is so robust that it has been found even among the intellectually sophisticated” (page. 97).

The research is also clear that those with a high SDO—like political conservatives—have a stronger belief in the influence of genetics on success/failure and ability (justification for the ruling elite), as opposed to environmental/societal factors determining success or failure. This is ironic because many conservatives are against evolution and darwinism, but ideologically they support this social Darwinism or survival of the fittest view, where the strong dominate and the weak and inferior should be left to suffer and die. Not much of a “family value,” or Christian principle. It does, however, fit with the Gordon Gecko types on Wall Street (Yes, Oliver Stone’s “Wall Street 2” is almost out…go see it!). Thomas Frank pointed out in “What the Matter with Kansas?,” that conservatives “talk Christ but act corporate.” If they actually believed in the teaching and principles of Christ, as set forth in the New Testament, they might no be the heartless blame-the-victim, help-the-rich, xenophobes that they are, and would score much lower on the scale of social dominance orientation. But back to social dominance theory.

Here are some additional—and brilliant—in sights about power that these fine researcher have found, through rigorous empirical research.

The Nature of Social Hierarchies (from the book “Social Dominance”):

  • Iron law of oligarchy: All social systems are inherently undemocratic and are ruled by a small elite who rationale their power by use of some system of justifying ideologies (23).
  • All societies are made up of two groups: one or a small number of dominant groups at the top, who possess a disproportionately large share of social value (such as resources); and one or more subordinate groups at the bottom, who possess a disproportionately large share of negative social value  (page. 31-32) ; in the modern U.S., dominants are the wealthy and powerful, subordinates are the poor and minority groups.
  • There are natural hierarchies (age and gender) and socially constructed, arbitrary-set social hierarchies (clan, ethnicity, nation, race, caste, class, religious sect, political party, etc.) (page. 32-33).
  • Societies that produce an economic surplus tend to have arbitrary-set social hierarchies—dominants and subordinates (page. 35).
  • Social systems are subject to two counterbalancing influences: (1) hierarchy-enhancing forces, and (2) hierarchy-diminishing forces (page. 38).
  • A “myth” appears to be true because there are enough people in society that behave as if they were true (p. 104); “Legitimizing myths” provide moral and intellectual justification to maintain hierarchal inequalities (page. 39, 45, 104)
  • There are two primary means by which dominant groups maintain their hegemonic position over subordinate groups: (1) the threat or actual naked force, and (2) control over ideology and the contents of “legitimate” social discourse…Control over discourse is usually preferred. (This same point has been made by Noam Chomsky many times over the past 30 years: In democratic societies physical force was no longer acceptable, so they had to figure out how to control people’s mind instead)
  • Ruling elites largely control the contents and framing of social discourse. Because of this control of social ideology, ruling elites are not only able to convince themselves but, more importantly, their subordinates of the legitimacy of their rule. This means the ruling class can exercise near hegemonic control over the social system without serious resistance from , and often with the cooperation of, the working class (page 22).
  • It is exactly those features that are more obviously exhibited by elites that will come to be defines as “mertiorious” (27)
  • By institutionalizing the differential allocation of various kinds of job to different social groups, societies create and maintain groups-based social dominance (page. 150)
  • Groups hierarchal societies are set up in ways that make life relatively easy for dominants and relatively difficult for subordinates (page. 227).
  • Dominants behave in ways that are more beneficial to themselves than subordinates do (page. 227,), that is, subordinates tend not to act in their own interest to the same extent as dominants do; (page. 306); ingroup favoritism is stronger among dominants than among subordinates
  • The persistence of group-based dominance rests on the coordination and choreographed actions of both dominants and subordinates alike (page. 307).

These finding help us to understand the importance of smart regulations and sound social policy that helps to minimize social dominance of one group over another. This kind of dominance limits freedom—a concern of all political parties. Throughout our history, we have steps forward and steps backward. But we can be hopeful that the trend has kept moving in the right direction. And it will continue to move in this direction (in spite of the TeaBaggers).

Be sure to check out the book!

Click on this link to view the book:
Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression

Advertisement

118 comments

  1. Luke says:

    Además, para que puedas probar los servicios con toda calma, Hostgator ofrece
    45 días de prueba en los que podrás pedir
    el reembolso de tu dinero en el caso de no quedar satisfecho
    con los servicios contratados.

  2. skunk says:

    An inbred cross of the Lowryder 2 from Joint Doctor,with
    a White Russian mother,from Serious Seeds. For macropsia (objects appearing large), remedies can sometimes include:.
    Wet macular degeneration often affects one eye first and
    the other within several years.

  3. Thanks for finally writing about > The Difference
    Between a Liberal and a Conservative | speakingofdemocracy.com < Loved it!

  4. EXCLUSIVE: Infamous French artist Patrick Bruel on why he’s finally performing britain for very first time in Three decades occupation

    Patrick Bruel – meet up with France’s answer to The Employer
    France’s favourte son will be upon us soon towards the UK

    source: https://patrickbrueltour.Wordpress.com/

  5. With the latest study from PEW Research stating that 95% of teens have access to the Internet,
    80% of kids have cell phones and 48% have data
    plans, providing a safe cyber-space should be a priority
    for all parents. , it is best to go for affiliate marketing being an initial step
    into the world of generating impartial income from home.
    A internet marketing business, in a nutshell, a business that’s designed to
    run on the internet via a website.

  6. Useful info. Fortunate me I found your site by accident,
    and I’m surprised why this accident didn’t took place earlier!

    I bookmarked it.

  7. Oma says:

    I am glad to be a visitor of this great website!

    Appreciate it for this superb information!

  8. Make use of reliable carpet cleaner machines that will get
    the task done smoothly. I combine this mixture in a spray bottle and
    squirt the affected are, not saturating it. You require to
    make the option based upon what you truly require, factoring in your spending plan, your design and how your
    house is created.

  9. Latasha says:

    Anew vinyl window can be up to 60% more efficient than old windows depending onn their
    condition. A new door can exponentially increase
    your curb appeal and freshen up the look of your home.

    Many people may see dark paneling in their rooms as a curse.

  10. Hello, this weekend is nice for me, as this
    time i am reading this wonderful informative article
    here at my house.

  11. va.mu says:

    For general stains, those ones that you didn’t clean up right away and a week later is just a blob that you don’t
    remember how it got there, use shaving cream.
    So, if you could not be on a ladder and still have your gutters clean, that is what I recommend.
    During the early years of carpet cleaning “true soaps” were
    used for cleaning.

  12. I am in fact grateful to the holder of this site who has
    shared this wonderful piece of writing at at this place.

  13. Admiring the hard work you put into your website and in depth information you provide.
    It’s nice to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same outdated rehashed information. Great read!
    I’ve saved your site and I’m including your RSS feeds to
    my Google account.

  14. And at the same time, you will get a chance of introducing
    neww tiles on the upper row. Aside from forums,
    blogs are also a good place to consult for cheats. Popcap Games in an American game developer and publisher based in Seattke and founded in 2000.
    You can construct a wide range of buildings from hotels and restaurants to discos and casinos.

  15. USAgain – a head of the cloth recycling business since the late 90s, USAgain is truly a for-profit company reuses and recycles clothing, shoes
    and other cloth. The aim is to try to provide people using an easy and even environmental idea to be able to rid their own self of needless outfits, which is often diverted away from landfills.
    USAgain sustains around 14,000 clothes collection boxes around
    19 provinces.

    At least 54 million pounds of fabrics have been collected with USAgain reusing bins across the United States
    within 2014.

    The nation’s clothes reuser presents a release to provide unwanted garments an extra situation via the web of a large
    number of recycling boxes based all over the country. From directing 54 ,000,000
    lbs of cloth, USAgain along with its customers
    avoided 378 million pounds of co2 away from getting into environment, preserved more than 75.6 billion gal of water, combined with 308,571 cubic metres land fill
    area.

    USAgain recycling systems are hosted in partnership with cities, area enterprises, affair
    based local pushes and also fundraisers intended for colleges and
    non-profits. At least 12,500 clothes collection bins in 19 provinces offer
    people an easy strategy for discarding the undesired items
    with an eco liable method.

    “All of us hope to decrease the harmful influences associated with clothing and shoes upon our ecosystem
    via improving reuse and recycling. The key element is to help textile reusing an easy component
    of lifestyle,” mentioned Mattias Wallander, head from USAgain. “Textile recycle strategies will get interest from organizations which has a intention to raise
    their general waste diversion rates and we’ve been working vigilantly to
    aid with their goal”.

  16. webpage says:

    McCorry Group are an International Lumber and Wood Trading firm.They’ve already offered resources

    based

    internationally together with they get based customers across the globe.

    McCorry’s perspective is to be a Internationally Favourite Distributor of Low-cost Eco-

    friendly Timber Goods.
    McCorry’s quest is filling

    Consumers’ Wants by way of the Continuous Supply of Superior Timber
    Items
    McCorry can become an educational

    source which investmentmembers

    for the Wood and Lumber area shall be required to

    consider.

  17. I got this website from my buddy who shared with me regarding this web page and at the moment
    this time I am browsing this web site and reading very informative content at
    this time.

  18. Great items from you, man. I have take note your stuff previous to and you are just extremely
    fantastic. I really like what you have got here, certainly
    like what you’re stating and the way in which in which
    you say it. You make it entertaining and you continue to care
    for to stay it smart. I cant wait to read much more from you.
    This is actually a wonderful website.

Leave a Reply