The history of U.S. relations with Latin America is a story of imperialism, exploitation, and crimes against humanity. Eduardo Galeano’s book, “Open Veins of Latin American,” is an excellent introduction to this history. Greg Grandin’s 2006 book, “Empire’s Workshop,” and Naomi Klein’s more-recent book, “The Shock Doctrine,” cover issues of modern economic and military imperialism in the region. From the Monroe Doctrine to the School of the Americas, the tax dollars of U.S. citizens have been used to sell arms to cruel militias, install and uphold brutal dictators, train anti-communist insurgencies in torture methods, implement trade policies that increase extreme poverty and inequality, and undermine democratic movements. But there are hopeful signs on the horizon.
In recent years, many Latin American nations are declaring their independence from U.S. intervention. They are freeing themselves of debt that make them beholden to U.S. corporate interests, and they are beginning a trend toward regional unification. This resistance is a major challenge to U.S. authority in the region–leading the Council on Foreign Relations to pronounce the Monroe Doctrine “obsolete.”
I have put together some notable points from various source below, including information about President Obama’s track record in Latin America.
Latin America’s Left Turn, Jorge G. Castaneda, Foreign Affairs, May/June 2006:
“Although the region has just enjoyed its best two years of economic growth in a long time and real threats to democratic rule are few and far between, the landscape today is transformed. Latin America is swerving left, and distinct backlashes are under way against the predominant trends of the last 15 years: free-market reforms, agreement with the United States on a number of issues, and the consolidation of representative democracy…
“Starting with Hugo Chávez’s victory in Venezuela eight years ago and poised to culminate in the possible election of Andrés Manuel López Obrador in Mexico’s July 2 presidential contest, a wave of leaders, parties, and movements generically labeled “leftist” have swept into power in one Latin American country after another. After Chávez, it was Lula and the Workers’ Party in Brazil, then Néstor Kirchner in Argentina and Tabaré Vázquez in Uruguay, and then, earlier this year, Evo Morales in Bolivia. If the long shot Ollanta Humala wins the April presidential election in Peru and López Obrador wins in Mexico, it will seem as if a veritable left-wing tsunami has hit the region. Colombia and Central America are the only exceptions, but even in Nicaragua, the possibility of a win by Sandinista leader Daniel Ortega cannot be dismissed.”
Reasons for Latin America’s turn to the left
- “The fall of the Soviet Union would help the Latin American left by removing its geopolitical stigma. Washington would no longer be able to accuse any left-of-center regime in the region of being a “Soviet beachhead” (as it had every such government since it fomented the overthrow of Jacobo Arbenz’s administration in Guatemala in 1954); left-wing governments would no longer have to choose between the United States and the Soviet Union, because the latter had simply disappeared.”
- “Latin America’s extreme inequality (Latin America is the world’s most unequal region), poverty, and concentration of wealth, income, power, and opportunity meant that it would have to be governed from the left of center. The combination of inequality and democracy tends to cause a movement to the left everywhere. This was true in western Europe from the end of the nineteenth century until after World War II; it is true today in Latin America. The impoverished masses vote for the type of policies that, they hope, will make them less poor.”
- “The advent of widespread democratization and the consolidation of democratic elections as the only road to power would, sooner or later, lead to victories for the left — precisely because of the social, demographic, and ethnic configuration of the region. In other words, even without the other proximate causes, Latin America would almost certainly have tilted left.”
Last year, the President of Ecuador, Rafael Correa, delivered on his campaign promise to refuse renewal of Washington’s decade-old, rent-free lease on an air base outside the Pacific’s main South American outpost. Ecudor’s new constitution calls for “universal disarmament” and opposes the “imposition” of military bases of “some states in the territory of others.” President Correa joked that, “We’ll renew the lease if the U.S. let’s us set up a base in Miami.” (Source: The Nation, 2/8/2010, Greg Grandin, Muscling Latin America).
Greg Grandin of The Nation reports: “Last year in Peru, massive indigenous protests forced the repeal of laws aimed at opening large swaths of the Amazon to foreign timber, mining, and oil corporations, and throughout the region similar activism continues to place Latin America in the vanguard of the anti-corporate and anti-militarist global democracy movement.” (Source: The Nation, 2/8/2010, Greg Grandin, Muscling Latin America).
Washington backed a military coup against democratically elected Hugo Chavez in 2002. The vast oil resources of Venezuela coupled with Chavez’s independence has made him a foe of American power since his election in 1998. Although Chavez have undoubtedly been authoritarian (perhaps even corrupt) in many regards, he is also doing many things to help the people of Venezuela. In his 2006 Foreign Affairs article on Chavez, Michael Shifter outlines some of Chavez’s accomplishments:
“Chávez’s government has undertaken important social programs and launched workers’ cooperatives in urban slums. Plans are under way to set up ‘social production companies’ that would extend the state sector and seek to distribute earnings among workers and community projects. Venezuela’s oil wealth has made massive expenditures possible — an estimated $20 billion in the past three years alone on programs to provide food, education, and medical care to underserved populations — which have undeniably had some effect.”
“[Chavez] is bravely fighting for Latin American solidarity and standing up to the overbearing United States. With charisma and oil dollars, he is seizing an opportunity to correct the power and wealth imbalances that have long defined Venezuelan and hemispheric affairs.”
View declassified documents on the attempted 2002 coup against Chavez.
Columbia remains the most repressive Latin American nation, and Washington’s closest regional partner. More than 500 trade-unionists have been executed since Uribe took office, and in recent years 195 teachers have been assassinated. The military has been accused of killing more than 2,000 civilians and dressing their bodies in guerrilla uniforms. Currently, the U.S. is expanding its bases in Columbia, including seven more in the works.
“The militarisation of Latin America has provoked a swell of protest. Almost all the governments of South America have spoken out against the Colombian bases deal. In Colombia, a wide coalition of grass-roots movements, including the country’s largest trade union federations, is braving paramilitary repression to speak out against the bases – which, they say, not only violate the country’s sovereignty but will exacerbate the country’s human rights crisis.” (Source)
Paraguay and Honduras
“In Paraguay, the Pentagon spent millions of dollars building a base with a state-of-the-art radar system, which opened in 2006. But to the consternation of US military planners, a progressive priest, Fernando Lugo, has won the presidency, so it looks as if the construction was a wasted investment.”
“Apart from the large numbers of US troops sited in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, the most important US base in the region is in Honduras, where 500 troops of Joint Task Force Bravo are stationed. One reason why Pentagon hardliners have been sympathetic to the recent coup in Honduras is because the ousted president, Manuel Zelaya, planned to start commercial flights from the base, compromising the security and secrecy of US operations on that vital installation.” (Source)
“Latin America’s new anti-base movement has an inspiring example in Puerto Rico. There tens of thousands of people protested and took part in civil disobedience campaigns against the US Navy, which for decades carried out bombing exercises on the small island of Vieques. The test bombs contained depleted uranium and carcinogenic chemicals such as triocyl phosphate. In 2003, the US Navy finally left Vieques and the Pentagon closed all but one of its military bases in Puerto Rico.” (Source)
“The 2004 documentary called The Take is about Argentina’s movement of worker-run businesses. In the wake of the country’s dramatic economic collapse in 2001, thousands of workers walked into their shuttered factories and put them back into production as worker cooperatives. Abandoned by bosses and politicians, they regained unpaid wages and severance while re-claiming their jobs in the process.” (source)
School of the Americas
“Latin American elites once gave US Green Berets free rein in their mountains and rainforests and schooled their own officers in US academies, where they learnt the latest counter-insurgency and torture techniques to be used against ‘subversives’. But today the ‘pink tide’ governments are pulling their officers out of US training schools. Argentina, Venezuela, Bolivia and Uruguay have now withdrawn from the School of Americas, the notorious institution that boasts 11 Latin American dictators among its graduates. Ecuador and Nicaragua are likely to withdraw their soldiers and Costa Rica, which has no army, has pulled out its police cadets. The School of Americas used to be based in the Panama Canal Zone, but has now moved to Fort Benning, Georgia and has a new anodyne name: the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation.” (Source)
Old Imperialism vs. New Imperialism
Debt has been used by advanced nations to control that South. At one point, the Haitian government was spending 80% of its national budget on debt repayments. Last year, much of Haiti’s debt was forgiven, but some $1 billion remains. Right now it needs aid in the form of grants, not loans. Its loan holders–the World Bank, the IMF, the Inter-American Development Bank, Venezuela, and Taiwan–should forgive its debt. A group of intellectuals and politicians has called on France to repay 17 billion euros “extorted” from Haiti in the 19th Century (source).
The Obama Administration
Greg Grandin of The Nation: “Barack Obama’s administration [is] disappointing potential regional allies but continuing to promote a volatile mix of militarism and free-trade orthodoxy in a corridor running from Mexico to Columbia…The White House could have restored democracy to Honduras, [but] instead capitulated to Senate Republicans and endorsed the murderous regime [the military coup that ousted the democratically elected regime]…Shortly after taking office, Obama abandoned hist pledge to renegotiate NAFTA. ”
Although Latin America is still controlled by neocolonial actors in the U.S. (i.e., multinational corporations, the U.S. military, etc.), there are promises signs that the region is working toward greater self-determination and independence. It is worth taking lessons from some of these movements.
A Brief History of U.S. Intervention in Latin American and the Carribean Since 1890 (source)
•Nearly all interventions defended or installed pro-U.S. dictators. • •Ideological agenda (defending capitalism) (Vietnam, Central America) • •Economic agenda (defending oil or investments) (Chile)
•A few interventions toppled dictatorships that had been backed by U.S. Intervened to prevent the people from overthrowing their own dictator first, and installing their own democratic government (Panama).
•Reinstalled democratically elected leader to office, but undercut his power and later encouraged his ouster (Haiti)
- ARGENTINA 1890 T Buenos Aires interests protected.
- CHILE 1891 T Marines clash with nationalist rebels.
- HAITI 1891 T Black revolt on Navassa defeated.
- NICARAGUA 1894 T Month-long occupation of Bluefields.
- PANAMA 1895 T, N Marines land in Colombian province.
- NICARAGUA 1896 T Marines land in port of Corinto
- CUBA 1898-1902 (-?) T, N Seized from Spain, still hold Navy base.
- PUERTO RICO 1898 (-?) T, N Seized from Spain, occupation continues.
- NICARAGUA 1898 T Marines land at port of San Juan del Sur.
- NICARAGUA 1899 T Marines land at port of Bluefields.
- PANAMA 1901-14 T, N Broke off from Colombia 1903, annexed Canal Zone 1914.
- HONDURAS 1903 T Marines intervene in revolution.
- DOMINICAN REP. 1903-04 T U.S. interests protected in Revolution.
- CUBA 1906-09 T Marines land in democratic election.
- NICARAGUA 1907 T “Dollar Diplomacy” protectorate set up.
- HONDURAS 1907 T Marines land during war with Nicaragua
- PANAMA 1908 T Marines intervene in election contest.
- NICARAGUA 1910 T Marines land in Bluefields and Corinto.
- HONDURAS 1911 T U.S. interests protected in civil war.
- CUBA 1912 T U.S. interests protected in civil war.
- PANAMA 1912 T Marines land during heated election.
- HONDURAS 1912 T Marines protect U.S. economic interests.
- NICARAGUA 1912-33 T, B 10-year occupation, fought guerillas
- MEXICO 1913 N Americans evacuated during revolution.
- DOMINICAN REP. 1914 N Fight with rebels over Santo Domingo.
- MEXICO 1914-18 T, N Series of interventions against nationalists.
- HAITI 1914-34 T, B 19-year occupation after revolts.
- DOMINICAN REP. 1916-24 T 8-year Marine occupation.
- CUBA 1917-33 T Military occupation, economic protectorate
- PANAMA 1918-20 T “Police duty” during unrest after elections.
- HONDURAS 1919 T Marines land during election campaign.
- GUATEMALA 1920 T 2-week intervention against unionists.
- HONDURAS 1924-25 T Landed twice during election strife.
- EL SALVADOR 1932 N Warships send during Farabundo Marti revolt.
- PANAMA 1925 T Marines suppress general strike.
- URUGUAY 1947 NT Bombers deployed as show of strength.
- PUERTO RICO 1950 CO Independence rebellion crushed in Ponce.
- GUATEMALA 1954 B, CO CIA directs exile invasion after new gov’t nationalized U.S. company lands; bombers based in Nicaragua.
- PANAMA 1958 T Flag protests erupt into confrontation.
- CUBA l961 CO CIA-directed exile invasion fails.
- CUBA l962 N, NT Blockade during missile crisis; near-war with USSR.
- PANAMA l964 T Panamanians shot for urging canal’s return.
- DOMINICAN REP. 1965-66 T, B Marines land during election campaign.
- GUATEMALA l966-67 CO Green Berets intervene against rebels.
- CHILE 1973 CO CIA-backed coup ousts elected marxist president.
- EL SALVADOR l981-92 T, CO Advisors, overflights aid anti-rebel war, soldiers briefly involved in1992 hostage clash.
- NICARAGUA l981-90 N, CO CIA directs exile (Contra) invasions, plants harbor mines vs Sandinista revolution.
- GRENADA l983-84 T, B Invasion four years after revolution ousts regime.
- HONDURAS l983-89 T Maneuvers help build bases near borders.
- BOLIVIA 1986 T Army assists raids on cocaine region.
- VIRGIN ISLANDS 1989 T St. Croix Black unrest after storm.
- PANAMA 1989 (-?) T, B Nationalist government ousted by 27,000 soldiers, leaders arrested, 2000+ civilians killed.
- HAITI 1994 T, N Troops restore Aristide to office 3 years after coup.
- COLOMBIA 2003-? T US special forces sent to rebel zone to back up Colombian military protecting oil pipeline.
- HAITI 2004-05 T, N Marines land after rebels oust elected Pres. Aristide.
- See this excellent article on U.S. Foreign Military Bases; and this map
- Great interview on Democracy Now
- International Network for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases: http://www.no-bases.org/
- Recommended books: “Empire’s Workshop,” Greg Grandin; “The Shock Doctrine,” Naomi Klein
- Documentaries: (1) Plan Columbia, (2) Why Global Poverty?, (3) The Shock Doctrine, (4) The Take
- Other great links on Latin America
- Oliver Stone’s new documentary, South of the Border.